| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
{['O_O']} Junior Jammer

Joined: 26 May 2021 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Thu May 27, 2021 7:33 am Post subject: Jamstix XL Samples - Dry or Processed? |
|
|
hello, first post!
I've been using JS4 Standard driving SSD5, works great!
On some songs the SSD5 "ready-to-mix" sounds are a bit too processed for my tastes, and would prefer samples that are a bit more raw.
I'm considering picking up the XL addon, if it will address this. I'm curious how much processing has been done on them, and is there a way to split out room, overhead and close mics to separate outputs?
DAW: Reaper
OS: Win10 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Azimuth Moderator & Beta Team

Joined: 19 Nov 2010 Posts: 2131
|
Posted: Thu May 27, 2021 12:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi and welcome to the forum,
In my opinion the "processing" is equivalent to the JS standard kits but all the JS 4 sounds are much more "pliable" due to the improved mixer in JS4. The Kits can be routed to separate mixer channels the same as the standard JS kit. The default 8 channel routing is Kick, Snare, Toms, Hats, Ride, Cymbals, Percussion, Ambience. HTH |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
{['O_O']} Junior Jammer

Joined: 26 May 2021 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Fri May 28, 2021 7:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| a_zimuth wrote: | Hi and welcome to the forum,
In my opinion the "processing" is equivalent to the JS standard kits but all the JS 4 sounds are much more "pliable" due to the improved mixer in JS4. The Kits can be routed to separate mixer channels the same as the standard JS kit. The default 8 channel routing is Kick, Snare, Toms, Hats, Ride, Cymbals, Percussion, Ambience. HTH |
yes, that's helpful, thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|