| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
steve b
Jamologist
Joined: 30 Jan 2005
Posts: 183
Location: England
|
 Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 8:22 pm Post subject: project 5 |
 |
|
I've got version one and I just checked it out and it's fine.I'll just go through what I did just in case you missed something. I open Sonar, install Jamstix in it's own audio box. click echo on in midi.I then inserted Project 5 as a rewire,added Z3ta and jammed around with that for a bit .Quite heavy on CPU AT 23% BUT NO CRASHES.I hope you get it working.It is well worth it.
_________________
EMU 1820M user |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mikey T
Junior Jammer
Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Posts: 15
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 9:03 pm Post subject: Re: project 5 |
|
|
| steve b wrote: | | I've got version one and I just checked it out and it's fine.I'll just go through what I did just in case you missed something. I open Sonar, install Jamstix in it's own audio box. click echo on in midi.I then inserted Project 5 as a rewire,added Z3ta and jammed around with that for a bit .Quite heavy on CPU AT 23% BUT NO CRASHES.I hope you get it working.It is well worth it. |
I was tryign to use in directly in P5, not P5 rewired in Sonar... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ralph [RZ]
Site Admin
Joined: 02 Jan 2008
Posts: 13332
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 9:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Did anybody try it in P5V2 via VST adapter, yet?
_________________
Ralph Zeuner
Rayzoon Technologies LLC
http://www.rayzoon.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mikey T
Junior Jammer
Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Posts: 15
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Zauni wrote: | | Did anybody try it in P5V2 via VST adapter, yet? |
Well, yes and no. The problem was discovered after the beta testing ended using the final release candidate. The actual released version isn't in anybody's hands yet that I know of. It will be a week or two before I can check that out. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mikey T
Junior Jammer
Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Posts: 15
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 5:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Mikey T wrote: | | Zauni wrote: | | Did anybody try it in P5V2 via VST adapter, yet? |
Well, yes and no. The problem was discovered after the beta testing ended using the final release candidate. The actual released version isn't in anybody's hands yet that I know of. It will be a week or two before I can check that out. |
My P5V2 shipping notification just came and according to the tracking is already here, awaiting Monday delivery. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Laurence
Jammer
Joined: 08 Apr 2005
Posts: 24
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 12:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I just got P5 version 2 a couple of days ago. With the latest version of Jamstix released yesterday on the 28th, Pro 5 still crashes as soon as Jamstix is called up. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Laurence
Jammer
Joined: 08 Apr 2005
Posts: 24
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 12:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Whatever the bug is it's worth working out. I've had P5 version 2 for just a couple of days and it's already my favorite DAW platform. It really is an awesome program! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ralph [RZ]
Site Admin
Joined: 02 Jan 2008
Posts: 13332
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Laurence wrote: | | I just got P5 version 2 a couple of days ago. With the latest version of Jamstix released yesterday on the 28th, Pro 5 still crashes as soon as Jamstix is called up. |
I just tested Jamstix with the P5 V2 demo and it works fine when wrapped with DirectiXer.
_________________
Ralph Zeuner
Rayzoon Technologies LLC
http://www.rayzoon.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Laurence
Jammer
Joined: 08 Apr 2005
Posts: 24
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 3:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Zauni wrote: | | Laurence wrote: | | I just got P5 version 2 a couple of days ago. With the latest version of Jamstix released yesterday on the 28th, Pro 5 still crashes as soon as Jamstix is called up. |
I just tested Jamstix with the P5 V2 demo and it works fine when wrapped with DirectiXer. |
OK that works. $45 that I'd rather not spend, but it does work.
I had to use the "alternate window sizing option" in order to see the Jamstix window. What are the best DirecteXer settings for Jamstix and M8?
Is DirecteXer 2.5 the latest version? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Laurence
Jammer
Joined: 08 Apr 2005
Posts: 24
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 4:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I can't get m8 to work with DirecteXer. Should I use Jamstix with the DirecteXer wrapper and M8 with the FXpansion/Cakewalk wrapper? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ralph [RZ]
Site Admin
Joined: 02 Jan 2008
Posts: 13332
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 6:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Laurence wrote: | OK that works. $45 that I'd rather not spend, but it does work.
|
We are working on a deal for Jamstix users.
| Quote: |
I had to use the "alternate window sizing option" in order to see the Jamstix window. What are the best DirecteXer settings for Jamstix and M8?
|
Yes, the alt GUI option is needed for Jamstix and audioM8. No other special settings are needed.
| Quote: |
Is DirecteXer 2.5 the latest version? |
Yes, it is
_________________
Ralph Zeuner
Rayzoon Technologies LLC
http://www.rayzoon.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ralph [RZ]
Site Admin
Joined: 02 Jan 2008
Posts: 13332
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 6:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Laurence wrote: | | I can't get m8 to work with DirecteXer. Should I use Jamstix with the DirecteXer wrapper and M8 with the FXpansion/Cakewalk wrapper? |
audioM8 should work fine in DirectiXer. What are your symptoms?
_________________
Ralph Zeuner
Rayzoon Technologies LLC
http://www.rayzoon.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mikey T
Junior Jammer
Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Posts: 15
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 7:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Laurence wrote: | | I can't get m8 to work with DirecteXer. Should I use Jamstix with the DirecteXer wrapper and M8 with the FXpansion/Cakewalk wrapper? |
You can run it in P5v2 using Chainer... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Laurence
Jammer
Joined: 08 Apr 2005
Posts: 24
|
| Posted: Sun May 01, 2005 7:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| OK, everything is really close to being cool now. My only problem right now is when I use Jamstix with DirecteXer, the output numbers of the ports are all screwed up. I want to be able to do the typical things like add a little extra low end to the kicks and keep them reverb free, and add just a hair more reverb to the snare than to the rest of the kit. When I assign drums to outputs though, they don't seem to come out of DirecteXer in the right order. Is there a particular setting that keeps the output order straight? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ralph [RZ]
Site Admin
Joined: 02 Jan 2008
Posts: 13332
|
| Posted: Sun May 01, 2005 8:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Laurence wrote: | | OK, everything is really close to being cool now. My only problem right now is when I use Jamstix with DirecteXer, the output numbers of the ports are all screwed up. I want to be able to do the typical things like add a little extra low end to the kicks and keep them reverb free, and add just a hair more reverb to the snare than to the rest of the kit. When I assign drums to outputs though, they don't seem to come out of DirecteXer in the right order. Is there a particular setting that keeps the output order straight? |
There are various output routing options in DirectiXer, just open the properties for Jamstix in DirectiXer and you'll see.
_________________
Ralph Zeuner
Rayzoon Technologies LLC
http://www.rayzoon.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
