Rayzoon Technologies LLC

[Jae.Thomas]

Hello,

I really want one workflow, and I really like jamstix - I have used it well in the past, but I find when composing quickly, for some reason I find the loops in SSD5 more realistic. Let me put some examples here:

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/kwjm29yeglgxa2s/AACnHeXKIsQo4VASg022bsKSa?dl=0

here was my approach

Drummer was James Stix for the whole thing

I loaded custom rock and built a song, looped one part.

Recorded the midi output

Rendered it.

Next I loaded a slate loop, a disco one - with a fill.

Sounds better. I notice the velocity is high tho - so I export the midi and render the loop.

I then turn the first jamstix loop higher velocity - sounds better but the fill is weaker.

I do the same thing with a disco style in Jamstix.

What are the differences to you? What can be done to improve or what can I change in my workflow?

The hihat seems particularly weak in the jamstix examples, along with the fills.

Used the blackbird kit from SSD4.

[Jae.Thomas]

updated with an original:

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/kwjm29yeglgxa2s/AACnHeXKIsQo4VASg022bsKSa?dl=0

check out the files called "Herald"

I think there is some minor difference in the hihats with SSD5 mapping

[Jae.Thomas]

regardless of what seems like hihat inconsistencies (which I would REALLY like solved) this is awesome to be able to put loops in here