Rayzoon Technologies LLC

[alexis]

Hi - I've got Cubase SX3, which has compressors and EQs available for VST instruments, and of course after rendering them to Audio.

How would folks compare the quality of the JS2 compressors/EQs with Cubase's? Are the JS2 compressors/eqs pretty basic quality, mainly for people that don't have access to a host with decent ones? Or are they actually pretty high quality?

I also have UAD compressors and eqs. Similar question here - would you recommend I use those rather than the ones in JS2?

Thanks -
_________________
Alexis
JS 3.6.1x64; Cubase 7.5.40 64 bit; i5-4570 3.2GHz, 16GB RAM; W7 SP1 64-bit on Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB; Seagate 1TB SATA 600 Audio Drive; UR28M; Motif8; UAD-2 Solo, BCF2K; TC Helicon VoiceOne; RevoicePro3

[Sheppol_A]

Although JS is a great program it's compressors and EQ are very limited.There are much better free VSTs out there for the job IMHO.

Try Boot EQ Mk11

http://varietyofsound.wordpress.com/downloads/


and for compression,

http://antress.myweb.hinet.net/

[alexis]

[Sheppol_A]

In effect I apply JS dry maybe with a little treble in the mixer.Then it's easier to apply the EQs and Compressors like you are doing in the DAW.JS is pretty good out-of-the-box but as said the material you record changes all the rules.